Muldrow One Year Later: What Has Changed (And What Hasn’t)

A free webinar co-sponsored by the MWELA Bench Bar Committee and the DC Bar, Labor and Employment Law Communities

In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, a unanimous Supreme Court held that to prove discrimination under Title VII, a plaintiff need only show that the challenged action by their employer “brought about some ‘disadvantageous’ change in an employment term or condition”; a plaintiff need not show that the harm was significant, serious, substantial, or any other similar adjective to prevail under Title VII. But what does this really mean in practice? For some, Muldrow is consistent with prior case law from the federal appeals court interpreting Title VII. For others, this may reflect a different standard. Hear from all sides – how a plaintiff’s attorney is counseling potential clients about whether their experience qualifies as a potential claim, how a management attorney is helping employers to navigate workplace issues in light of this standard, and how litigators and a federal court judge apply Muldrow while litigating these claims in court.

This event does not offer CLE credit. Registrants will receive Zoom login details on the day before the event.

Speakers/Opening Remarks:
	D’Ontae D. Sylvertooth Communities Vice Chair DC Bar- Labor and Employment Communities
Panelists:
	Hon. Loren L. AliKhan U.S. District Court District of Columbia
	Andrew Adelman Correia & Puth, PLLC
	Lindsey White Jackson Lewis
Moderator:
	R. Scott Oswald Managing Principal The Employment Law Group, P.C.

This webinar will be conducted over Zoom.

Please Note:
- Advanced registration is required to receive the Zoom link.
- CLE is not offered for this program. Recording is not permitted.

Click Here to Register

Thank you to our event Co-host